| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"1 for good looks"
I ran it for 5 minutes and discovered it won't do the things I need to do. A light weight.
Back to the drawing board.
Deleted.
Back to old trustworthy Firefox.
by: microsquishee | 1 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
"Candidato a nº 1"
Apesar de ser Beta, já demonstra ser bem melhor que o IE e estar superior ao novo Firefox 3. Rápido, eficaz, bastante funcional e bonito.
by: M0chit0 | 5 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
"not good..."
it's simple. it take a lot of memory (compared to opera9.51) when opening many tab. the speed is ok. but its not good enough yet compared to opera & firefox. doesn't impress me
by: aku46 | 2 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
"Does this use active x like Internet Explorer?"
Sorry to give a rating when I have never tried this before, but I have a question that I hope somebody may answer. Does this browser's engine run off of active x such as IE, and is the browser engine basically based off of IE? This I beleive to be a valid question as to answer how secure of a browser this really is. I currently use Opera, because it has its very own browser engine uniquely different to the others in that it has nothing to do with active x unless you happen to install an active x plug-in.
by: jason | 3 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
"Good experience..."
Better than most browsers except perhaps Opera. Still, there is room for improvement. After all, Opera,Safari,Firefox and IE have had years for improvement and it is Chrome's first beta release
by: User | 4 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
"Google Chrome"
Possibly the best browser ever as far as rendering engines and java apps and other hidden features go.But,on the surface,it`s too simplistic.I went back to the latest Fiefox.
by: rick james | 3 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
"Just wait the stable version"
Installed it today, try to browse around with ith. It's so 'minimize' I'm abit confused where to go. Not faster than Firefox either. I guess because it's beta. I'll wait for the stable version
by: PAR | 3 | 2008-09-03 |
| | |
""
I like it It is better than Firefox
by: | 5 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
"Not as Good as Firefox!"
Firefox is way better! I have yet to see if google chrome can do everything that firefox can. Stick with Firefox. Wake up ED. FireFox rulz!
by: Maniac08 | 2 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
"spookey"
I haven't actually used it but I read the license agreement and that was enough for me. Thanks but no thanks..
by: Ian | 1 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
"Needs Work.!!"
I uninstalled it. It's one of the most minimalist browser designs I've seen.
Its not even up to Freeware Standards..!!
by: Joe | 2 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
"Meh"
I didn't like it. It system resource usage was nothing special, still used up a good chunk, and most of the features remind me of IE7, which isn't good. Another thing that topped it off is it auto installs itself into the user directory, which is terrible if you like to keep your programs organized like I do.
by: Metzo | 2 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
"minimalist design - don't like it"
I am not an IE Fan, but I do use Firefox and have for years. After installing Chrome and importing my Firefox bookmarks, and working within Chrome for all of about 10 minutes, I uninstalled it. It's one of the most minimalist browser designs I've seen, has almost no transitional functionality that either users of IE or Firefox would be interested in, and my two cents' worth is it's pretty worthless. I have no idea what they are thinking when they designed this clunker...
by: reverbfreak | 1 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
""
I agree.Chrome is an excellent browser and very fast.
by: | 5 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
"Google Chrome"
Not bad but many useful things are missing. Too many to write them here
by: Nocturnus | 2 | 2008-09-02 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
