|
|
 | Review | Rating | Date |
|
| "Much Better than MS Paint" This Is So Much Better Than MS Paint Which Comes With Windows.Works Good With Gif and Jpeg Images.Also Works Very Well On Vista Home Basic.This One Of The Better Paint Programs Out There.
by: Mouse Chaser
| 4 | 2008-07-08 |
|
|
| "Get It" Nicely done! Easy to use and wonderful to make bad images look good. Lot of tools u may find in very expensive software. Many thanks to the author for making this terrific software available. Very small foot print and is not bloated.
by: ThisBoy
| 5 | 2008-06-19 |
|
|
| "Layers!!!" You can work with layers! This is not to take for granted among freeware photo editing software. Great!
by: Smoochy
| 5 | 2008-01-14 |
|
|
| "easy" easy to use and friendly
by: paintware
| 5 | 2007-11-21 |
|
|
| "" Thanks!
Bye I´m Joshua
by: Joshua
| 5 | 2007-08-31 |
|
|
| "I used" To use this program, but then they updated and stopped support of 2000. So now I have to use a out-dated version of it.
by: Reviewer
| 2 | 2007-08-24 |
|
|
| "paint mejorado" mejores imagenes
by: Rubeen
| 5 | 2007-08-13 |
|
|
| "Fast and Free" I disagree that Photobie is better than Paint.NET. As far as my business needs, Paint.NET is the fastest and most efficient program I have used. I do like the GIMP as well but doing some image editing on the fly, I always turn to this application.
by: ninjaloot
| 5 | 2007-05-30 |
|
|
| "good but not terrific" Paint.Net is surely a nice program, but it is far from complete. You will find lots of missing features if you start to do some real painting seriously. For general purpose, it is good enough. It is true that most XP by default have .Net framework, but it is version 1.1 not 2.0, by all means, you have to download and install it to be able to use Paint.Net It is unfair to say GIMP and Pain.Net are the only real players. If you look around you will find many other good candidates such as artweaver, it is a perfect free tool for real Painting. As to photo editing, another free .Net application Photobie gets much more features, which let you to get things done nicely.
Because Paint.Net has some link to Microsoft, it appears to be more popular than others. In fact, you should always look for alternatives for the best fit.
by: oppo
| 4 | 2007-01-19 |
|
|
| "Excellent!" -Anti-net says use photofiltre... well, an editor without multiple layers fonction is not good enough and I don't want to pay to get it, so paint.Net is an excellent freewareand if you don't want to install the .Net framework, well, it's allready included in XP from the start. There's only 2 real editors out there:The Gimp (and its little brother full of bugs The GimpShop) and Paint.net, even if I never found a magnetic lasso.
by: Skooal
| 5 | 2006-11-12 |
|
|
| "Try Windows programs first" Great program, but you have to install ".net framework"
Do you want to "paint" or promote ".net"
Try PhotoFiltre - Forget .net
by: Anti-net
| 1 | 2006-06-06 |
|
|
| "Terrific free graphics program!" Paint.Net is great. I've been using it for almost a year and it gets better with every release. It pretty much does everything that you need with regard to image manipulation. Don't get me wrong: Paint.Net isn't super-feature filled like commercial programs -- but most likely, it has what you need to get your image editing done simply and easily. This program is WELL worth the download!
by: CharlieOrlando
| 5 | 2006-05-11 |
|
|
| "Paint.net is free" Paint.net is free and you can also get the source code free:
http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/download.html
by: Not Fezaad
| 5 | 2006-04-09 |
|
|
| "not freeware" i think freewarefiles.com should gt rid of this program
by: fezaad
| 1 | 2006-02-18 |
|
|
| "Duh" Bobad (I know it's you), you DO NOT have to "revert" to .NET 1.1. You can run versions 1.x and 2.0 ALONGSIDE EACH OTHER!
If your .NET apps work with version 1.1, DON'T UPGRADE.
by: x
| 5 | 2005-11-14 |
|
|
