| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"OK" by: stasio
Other Thoughts: Super!Was this review helpful? 28 out of 54 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-11-28 |
 | | |
"Really Excellent" by: ebalaskas
Other Thoughts: Simple this is only the best software
for web development.Was this review helpful? 23 out of 53 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2006-05-27 |
 | | |
"This is GOOD!" by: cybernaut guy
Other Thoughts: Was using Nvu, and tried a lot of others . . but, when I tried HTML-Kit it has been unbelievable. I'm really new at this, but have studied a lot the last few months. Was able to start using immediately and finding new applications all the time. Great for CSS, including templates you find online. Try it today! You'll be glad.Was this review helpful? 26 out of 60 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2006-03-18 |
 | | |
"My opinion" by: rubgeo
Other Thoughts: It is too hard for me :)) I do not like Interfaces with so much buttons and do not like HTML-only editors - my lovely editor is Edit Plus for its simplicity, universality and small resource requirements, and it has string replace/block replace tool which I could not find in HTML-kit...Was this review helpful? 24 out of 50 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2004-08-22 |
 | | |
by: Jack
Other Thoughts: A make weekly uppdates to a little website. I tried about 10 editors and this one was the easiest and quickest to learn. Was this review helpful? 28 out of 54 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2003-01-10 |
 | | |
"Excellent HTML editor" by: BC
Other Thoughts: Unbelievably great! This editor is one of the best in the world... however, I wish it were easier to use.Was this review helpful? 22 out of 47 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2002-10-25 |
 | | |
by: Dave
Other Thoughts: If you want to make DHTML pages, this is the best there is, and I've tried a few. It is *not* wysiwyg, but other than that, coding up a page or site could not be easier. What's especially good is the facility to make plugins "on the fly," as well as the wealth of plugins already available.Was this review helpful? 26 out of 45 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2002-02-15 |
 | | |
by: Mike
Other Thoughts: Even worse than FrontPageWas this review helpful? 34 out of 66 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2001-07-19 |
 | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|