| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"Clone"
by: python
Other Thoughts: Another IE clone in different clothes. Bad as the original.Was this review helpful?   58 out of 109 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-04-11 |
| | |
"Never used"
by: Ashu
Other Thoughts: I never used it,FF is better I guessWas this review helpful? 53 out of 94 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-02-07 |
| | |
"Browwwwwser"
by: Sachin
Other Thoughts: Excellent Browser Runs Very FastWas this review helpful? 47 out of 92 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2007-12-25 |
| | |
"IE engine sucks"
by: Cooley Spunk
Other Thoughts: IE engine sucks always. It's just Internet Explorer with another dress, therefore hackers and worms still are able to screw your comp with ease - thanks to the worst technology MS ever introduced: Active ShXt!Was this review helpful? 50 out of 103 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-11-23 |
| | |
"Great"
by: camron
Other Thoughts: Fast web browsing seems faster than firefox and a small size.Was this review helpful? 50 out of 102 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-11-07 |
| | |
"Great Browser"
by: UsingItMyself
Other Thoughts: This browser on my Vista home premium seems to be faster than the new "Safari Beta" by apple. This is one great browser! Very,Very Fast! And it seems to work with my Microsoft Fingerprint Reader also! Try it you wont regret it!
Was this review helpful? 52 out of 103 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-09-23 |
| | |
by: GAIO CHERELLIS
Other Thoughts: THE OTHERS BROWSERS ARE:FINE B.(FREE ONLY FOR A MONTH),APPLE B.(SPYWARE!),CRAZY B.(DIFFICULT TO ERASE),DEEPNET B.(PROBLEMS WITH SCRIPTS),WYSIGOTL.(POOR),WEB B.(LESS THAN FAIR),GHOST N.(A TRUE LIE),550 ACCESS(NOT FREEWARE AT ALL),PICEA B.(A RUBBISH!),1 ZIP C. (TOO MUCH COMPLEX FOR THE DOWNLOADS),QBROWSER (POOR),BLUTO (PERMISSION TO DOWNLOAD REFUSED!),CRAWLER B.(SPYWARE!),XENON TURBO (404 NOT FOUND),ATOM B.(TOO MUCH SIMPLE ).MR.SUCK,I'M WAITING A REPLY.Was this review helpful? 60 out of 111 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-07-26 |
| | |
"Gaio, Fourty Browsers"
by: Ivehadit
Other Thoughts: Prey tell why Fourty Browsers. It still sucks. Was this review helpful? 57 out of 117 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-07-03 |
| | |
"Even one of the Best"
by: Arcane
Other Thoughts: One of the fastet.As good as the World.
Was this review helpful? 60 out of 113 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-06-15 |
| | |
by: GAIO CHERELLIS
Other Thoughts: I AM SURE THAT THE JUNK IS IN THE LITTLE BRAIN OF USER THAT WROTE SO. THIS NEW VERSION IS QUITE DIFFERENT OF THE OLDERS. I DOWNLOATED IT FOR THREE TIMES: THE FIRST ONE YEAR AGO,THE SECOND AT THE END OF THE YEAR.FOR THIS REASON I CAN SPEAK WITH KNOWLEDGE. THIS IS THE SAME EVENT OF GREEN BROWSER THAT NOW IS BECOME MY PREFERRED BROWSER.I DOWNLOATED MORE THAN FOURTY FREE BROWSERS,I AM NOT A BEGINNER LIKE THE USER!Was this review helpful? 47 out of 109 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2007-06-14 |
| | |
"Wondering!"
by: Ivehadit
Other Thoughts: Who actually developed this piece of junk.Was this review helpful? 62 out of 114 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-06-13 |
| | |
"Despite the hype"
by: Hell Noire
Other Thoughts: This browser is worse then IE.Was this review helpful? 53 out of 100 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2007-04-08 |
| | |
by: macdad
Other Thoughts: set up program, went to use it,& was advised by my SnoopFree program that it was a keylogger. got rid of it.Was this review helpful? 53 out of 105 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-01-31 |
| | |
"not used"
by: doug rosbury
Other Thoughts: not yet tried outWas this review helpful? 60 out of 115 users found this review helpful.
| | 2006-11-26 |
| | |
"very fast"
by: Dr Gamri
Other Thoughts: I did not readily believe it but this browser is the fastest I have ever tried , amazigly fast and problem free.Was this review helpful? 57 out of 120 users found this review helpful.
| | 2006-11-11 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
