| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"dont upgrade"
by: mdruid
Winamp Full 5.621
Pros: may have a few. was too exasperated to look at them Cons: Removes Shoutcast. Other Thoughts: NoneWas this review helpful?   38 out of 77 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2011-07-13 |
| | |
"Buggy"
by: Davo
Winamp Full 5.62
Pros: Excellent sound Cons: Will not acknowledge MP3 player, also start DLLs go missing Other Thoughts: Nags and nags and nags me to upgrade, am unable to stop this.
5.541 was the last decent version that worked every time!Was this review helpful? 36 out of 71 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2011-07-01 |
| | |
"super"
by: rda
Other Thoughts: zakkasWas this review helpful? 93 out of 186 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2010-07-26 |
| | |
"AIMP vs Winamp"
by: Funny Bunny
Other Thoughts: Winamp still is a an ok player. It simply depends on your needs and system specs. As for me, I switched to AIMP, because it is lightweight, has everything I need plus audio recorder and converter, and it can play any music file. Winamp can do lots of things too, but is too bloated for me and very sluggish. But if you have lots of RAM and don't care about a CPU eater, then stick with Winamp.Was this review helpful? 130 out of 223 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2010-06-30 |
| | |
by: Stop Fighting Brats
Other Thoughts: I might be an AIMP2 fan but WinAmp does have some features that AIMP2 only dreams about.
That being said, if you're looking for an all-in-one media player that does everything, get a life. Because they're all crude. AIMP2 or WinAmp for Audio, VLC or WMP for Video. If you use one thing with everything, you miss out a lot.Was this review helpful? 93 out of 179 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-05-29 |
| | |
"and like i said before..."
by: Metalhorde
Other Thoughts: Can aimp play videos...? NO... BLOATED ? Maybe people should disable the winamp otions it gives at the start up process mm...????Was this review helpful? 95 out of 287 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-05-28 |
| | |
"just ok"
by: mad
Other Thoughts: I used and liked Winamp back in the old days (I also tried the some of the new releases). But it was becoming more bloated as time progressed. Then I switched to Foobar, but it still wasnt the right thing. When I switched to AIMP, I never looked back...it has got everything an user might want - without the bloat or overly complicated settings.Was this review helpful? 184 out of 280 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-05-27 |
| | |
"It will work for you"
by: mj
Other Thoughts: For all my music needs, this is by far the best there is. It also does a very good job of burning audio Cd's. I really
love the milk drop visualization.
Thank you guys..Was this review helpful? 98 out of 199 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-12-17 |
| | |
"favourite jukebox"
by: itwriter
Other Thoughts: Winamp rules. Customisable interface, plays every audio format, rips, burns, tags, talks to iPods, supports some awesome playback-enhancing plugins, doesn't freeze or crash, has designer skins to die for, and you don't have to pay for it. Really -- with the exception of (a) MediaMonkey, which looks like a six-year old's colouring-in project, (b) J. River Media Jukebox, which is stodgy and unexciting, (c) Foobar, which looks like manure-painted cardboard no matter how many incomprehensible plugins you cram into it, (d) Songbird, which may be promising but doesn't deliver much, and (e) Aimp, which plays in a different market anyway (no video playback, for instance), Winamp has no real competition. And c'mon now -- (f) Windows Media Player and (g) iTunes are worth considering only if you're happy never being able to play music encoded in more than a tiny handful of formats. Plus WMP looks a bit Disney and it doesn't behave in a user-friendly manner. And iTunes is the worst case of bloatware I have ever seen (90 MB setup files and all that). Also, don't go comparing Winamp to lightweight players that don't have a proper jukebox interface -- if it struggles even to offer a playlist, then you shouldn't be comparing its light memory usage to Winamp's -- they belong in distinctly different categories. As I said: Winamp rules, and that's that.Was this review helpful? 153 out of 250 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-12-10 |
| | |
"yes its bloated"
by: aku46
Other Thoughts: it just like using adobe acrobat reader when u hav foxit reader..Was this review helpful? 91 out of 176 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-07-07 |
| | |
by:
Other Thoughts: XMMS (on Linux) is modelled after WinAmp, so they look and feel similar. Which is great, I've been looking for exactly that since I couldn't get XMMS for Windows.
By the way, in response to the previous guy: "The new versions won't even install on my winME" Windows ME??? LOLWas this review helpful? 96 out of 190 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-05-02 |
| | |
by: Mark
Other Thoughts: the new versions wont even install on my winMEWas this review helpful? 91 out of 186 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-03-10 |
| | |
"...for a measly 2mb Mp3??"
by: flipper
Other Thoughts: I dont need a Humvee, when a mobike can do the job.
Winamp needs to go on dieting....way TOO bloated for playing a measly mp3.
I prefer AlSong,..simple and cute. Was this review helpful? 114 out of 200 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-01-24 |
| | |
"AIMP2"
by: ralphsmole
Other Thoughts: Be serious..AIMP2 reeks. Winamp will ALWAYS be a MUCH better player. Was this review helpful? 82 out of 179 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-01-23 |
| | |
"Bullcrap"
by: Bullcrap
Other Thoughts: Like many others have said before me, "Winamp is bloated and useless." It has a lot of features that you don't even need and slows down Winamp by a lot. AIMP2 is better and can play pretty much any music file.Was this review helpful? 102 out of 190 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-10-19 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
