| | | |
|
|
 | | |
by: swreynolds
Other Thoughts: I fed it a PDF and what it produced locked up both Word and Open OfficeWas this review helpful?   23 out of 50 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2010-07-03 |
| | |
by: aku46
Other Thoughts: Very big output file (pdf=15mb->rtf=129mb) with low quality result. Prefer Free PDF to Word Converter 4.2.Was this review helpful? 33 out of 57 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-08-29 |
| | |
"Works but not good"
by: PKAY
Other Thoughts: Does not do a complete conversion Tect is misspl;aced and Photos have bars through it. Much better program is
Free PDF to Word ConverterWas this review helpful? 26 out of 45 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-08-28 |
| | |
"Nice"
by: LostCauses
Other Thoughts: it converted the pdf, with fotos, and opened "wordpad" (it comes with "Windows" SO).
After that, I saved the result text showed in "wordpad". It saved the text in "rtf" by default.
Later, I opened that file in "openOffice" and I saved in "doc" or other open extension.
I must say that the aplication recognized portuguese acentuation of vogals.
Not great but nice. It works for me.
Don't try it in password protected pdf files, it will not work.
Excuse my english.Was this review helpful? 23 out of 50 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-07-22 |
| | |
"Confused"
by: Jo the sailor
Other Thoughts: I tried to convert a PDF to Word which is not installed on my machine as I use OpenOffice. The converter does something and then starts WordPad which shows an empty text area and the filename with the extension PDF in the title bar. I cannot find a DOC file.
This may be a shortcoming on my end but the prereqs should mention any limitations.
I hope it works the next time.
Was this review helpful? 29 out of 64 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-07-08 |
| | |
"Useless!"
by: Tall53
Other Thoughts: Installed ok but when trying to convert a simple pdf file to Word 2007 it locked Word and failed completely. A lot more work needed to run on modern pc's with good software installed.Was this review helpful? 24 out of 50 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-03-02 |
| | |
"for English characters only"
by: Henry
Other Thoughts: This piece of freeware is good as it captures text and graphics, although somewhat displaced from their original positions. Conversion is fast, and the resulting file size is about twice that of the orginal pdf. These are the good points. The bad point about this software is that all Chinese text disappear. It seems that this software can only handle single-byte characters. Was this review helpful? 19 out of 56 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-12-05 |
| | |
"aeh"
by: bob00
Other Thoughts: It might have worked well for simple text, but it doesn't work too well when there are multiple columnsWas this review helpful? 43 out of 69 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-09-10 |
| | |
"tu"
by: tu
Other Thoughts: goodWas this review helpful? 22 out of 49 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-09-06 |
| | |
"Does what it claims"
by: Marcelle
Other Thoughts: It's the only converter that does what it claims to do. Thanks.Was this review helpful? 27 out of 58 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-07-05 |
| | |
"Doesn't Work !"
by: Brunosec
Other Thoughts: All went well until after showing 100% conversion I got a messgae about a C++ error and that the program is closing in an unexpected way. Also tried it on 2 other computers. Same result.Was this review helpful? 35 out of 60 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-06-03 |
| | |
"We gave it a rate of 5 in the scale of 1 to 10."
by: Dr. Nemo
Other Thoughts: Definitively, this promising freeware that needs of previously installed
Office, should improve very much in that it makes. If it is
a simple pdf it has the same virtue of Some PDF 2 TXT more the incentive of the format and the fonts, but, in the moment to face, for example, and just as we saw it in the tests, a file of 1.76 MB, a pdf version 1.6, corresponding to a magazine type Newsweek digitized, the result was more than disappointing: the rtf that gave us was almost bigger 45 times that the original file and the melánge of texts and images were, simply, horrible. Wanting to solve the problem, we remit ourselves to its configuration panel and, alas! , it did not work in anything. We gave it a rate of 5 in the scale of 1 to 10.
Was this review helpful? 23 out of 53 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-05-25 |
| | |
by: Just Me
Other Thoughts: Previous version seems to have been removed from this site, just as well for it didn't work. This one did indeed work, at least in my first try a few moments ago. Saved the file to rtf not doc format but with photos and text in proper layout, so I'm pleased so far.Was this review helpful? 26 out of 62 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-05-16 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
