| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"Don't work 0("
by: Zh
Panopreter 3.0.9
Other Thoughts: No pros , no cons. The program just said "No language support" (for English).
;0( I have WinVistaWas this review helpful?   30 out of 59 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2011-04-01 |
| | |
"Cool Windows 7 utility"
by: pc_user
Panopreter 3.0.9
Other Thoughts: When it's running on Windows 7, the voice is natural and clear. It's cool!Was this review helpful? 23 out of 50 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2011-02-01 |
| | |
"My review"
by: Panuser
Panopreter 3.0.9
Cons: It did not work after pasting a small chunk of text on the top right box. Looks like it's only a teaser. A waste of time. Have uninstalled. Other Thoughts: NoneWas this review helpful? 21 out of 53 users found this review helpful.
| | 2011-01-22 |
| | |
"I love this program!"
by: Kim
Panopreter 3.0.9
Other Thoughts: I have downloaded several different text reading programs and I am really impressed with Panopreter. Default voice is great, very clean speaking.Was this review helpful? 33 out of 76 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-10-24 |
| | |
by: eddy
Other Thoughts: excellent freewareWas this review helpful? 30 out of 64 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-06-13 |
| | |
"super"
by: vamsi
Other Thoughts: its very usefull and niceWas this review helpful? 32 out of 68 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-05-27 |
| | |
"good for being free"
by: jason
Other Thoughts: I tried this, and it worked fine for me, but concerning the issue about quality output from the last reviewer, the quality of the output heavily depends on what voice you use. I found one called neospeech I think some time back, and that made a world of difference. One of the voice names I remember using from neospeech were Paul and Kate tts engines, which sounded very natural. So if you want good quality, try both neospeech's tts engines in combination with panopreter or any app like panopreter.Was this review helpful? 36 out of 71 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-04-27 |
| | |
"Poor output"
by: taryn
Other Thoughts: The output of my text was horrible! I could not discern a word that was spoken. I created two versions .wav and .mp3. Both were just as bad. I will try again to see if this was just a fluke though.Was this review helpful? 34 out of 68 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-10-15 |
| | |
"not good"
by: rhoadesb
Other Thoughts: I tried it but found it:
a> did not format to fit the screen resolution properly. Because of that I could see all of the controls. I was forced to "control/alt/delete" to close the program.
b> I had no readme.txt, etc. to assist me with the download. Was this review helpful? 35 out of 76 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-03-25 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
