 |  |  |  | | | | | |
|  | | | "Awesome"
by: Maleck
Other Thoughts: I have a Vista computer and this is a very efficient program and am using it now as I speak. Excellent despite its little flaws for Vista.Was this review helpful?   26 out of 64 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-06-02 | | | | "Clarifications"
by: Biotech
Other Thoughts: Being the developer, I'd like to address this past little succession of comments. I believe Anion is using a slightly older version (perhaps 0.9.0) which did indeed use about 4000K of RAM. 0.9.1 does seem to use more, like has been said. I've found the issue and have been able to drop that usage by 50-60%, so stay tuned for version 0.9.2 (just run the updater once in a while). :)
Any particular target range that you'd find acceptable that I optimize it for? Was this review helpful? 26 out of 62 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-05-26 | | | | "Anion,Where Have You Been?"
by: Expert
Other Thoughts: Correction, it is eating 11,728K(the least), and not 4,000K.
The program is quite good but yes, it eats too much memory. Quite impractical for a little program like this and its purpose.
So Anion, wake up.Was this review helpful? 28 out of 68 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-05-25 | | | | "Nothing wrong here"
by: Anion
Other Thoughts: Not really sure why a few people think it uses too many system resources, it uses over 30 times less RAM than this Firefox window does on my system. Is using 4000k really that bad? o_0 That's just barely more than what iTunes is using to check 24/7 for an ipod, lol.Was this review helpful? 26 out of 54 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-05-24 | | | | "High memory usage"
by: Al
Other Thoughts: For a simple program like this it uses more memory than Windows Task Manager!Was this review helpful? 28 out of 60 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-05-24 | | | | "Worked Great"
by: slim8
Other Thoughts: Everything seemed to work ok. Looks really pretty. Only ~1% usage for me... Was this review helpful? 33 out of 68 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-05-18 | | | | "good but"
by: funten
Other Thoughts: program is good but it eats cpu usage.Was this review helpful? 24 out of 57 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-05-18 | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
