|
|
 | Review | Rating | Date |
|
| "Ok, but..." Average app, but it still lacks of Unicode support.
by: Gary
| 3 | 2008-04-29 |
|
|
| "great!" i can say its better than winrar. support more compression method. i try maximum compression method of both software and Izarc create smaller file although the difference is small.
by: aku46
| 5 | 2008-03-07 |
|
|
| "Excellent" This program is an ultimate archiving solution. It supports almost all the archiving formats available. Also it has many inbuilt functions, you will never need another tool for zipping.
by: Abhishek
| 5 | 2008-02-25 |
|
|
| "BEST!!" Why i need (and pay for)RAR if i get 7zip and more formats in this wonderfull apps? The best archiver and if you find ugly his icons you can get better here http://www.izarc.org/for...ewtopic.php?p=1521#1521
by: Chocobito
| 5 | 2008-02-05 |
|
|
| "Worthless" It doesn't create .rar and it does bad what WinRar does in an excellent way.
Stick to WinRar: even if it nags with the "demo" message, it worths thousand times this freeware!
by: Fairy
| 1 | 2008-02-02 |
|
|
| "the best" tried several packers from here. some were outdated, such as tugzip. others were total crap in usage, such as peazip. others did not fit all my needs, such as 7-zip. but izarc has all i want! all thumbs up!
by: Ronny_3
| 5 | 2008-02-02 |
|
|
| "Solid App" I have used many compression utilities and this is the best of the lot. It has a simple interface, explorer integration, and opens any archive file thrown at it. I have also made a MSI installer for active directory installation that works well. So to sum it up ) complaints and a 100% product! Cheers to IZArc.
Mongojim
by: Mongojim
| 5 | 2008-02-01 |
|
|
| "Great, and with 7 zip you dion't need paid compressors." Why create rar files? you can use 7z or zip files. Izarch can handle rar files if you download them.
I use 7zip and this, and i don't need an illegal version of winrar.
No patches, no cracks, all freeware.
In conjuntion with 7 zip is the best.
by: Rafel
| 4 | 2008-01-30 |
|
|
| "Could be better!" I said it b4, IZArc still can't create rar sets for that winrar is needed.:-(
by: Ray Alex
| 3 | 2008-01-22 |
|
|
| "Good program!" Is a very good and easy program, is the best in it´s class
by: Phy
| 5 | 2008-01-17 |
|
|
| "Damned fine" A necessary part of system tools. Have not found better.
by: Alistair
| 5 | 2007-12-28 |
|
|
| "Very good!" It is one of the best available freeware archivers. However, from time to time I get some strange behaviour in conjunction with rar-files. That is to say it extracts an empty folder. Probably has something to do with long filenames within the archive. 7-zip works better when it comes to reliability. However, 7-zip is ugly. IZarc is also not a beauty, but more handy in everday usage. I'd prefer TUGZip after all, but it seems the development for this software stopped. So I stick with IZArc.
by: McDonalds Eater
| 4 | 2007-12-24 |
|
|
| "Best of best" can compress files 10 different formats.has ability to convert "cd image files" to different formats (iso to bin etc.)
can extract files from image files.
icons are great.
by: kai mappi
| 5 | 2007-12-16 |
|
|
| "IZArc excellent" if you find ugly the icons for IZArc go here...
http://www.izarc.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1521#1521
by: Chocobito
| 5 | 2007-12-15 |
|
|
| "good, but tugzip is ..." i tested both for a longer period. izarc has some bugs, tugzip runs perfect. izarc is a bit ugly, tugzip has a neat look. so whatcha think which one i chose?
by: conor mcsurey
| 3 | 2007-11-23 |
|
|
