| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"Good software"
by: Samson
PeaZip 3.9.1
Pros: Opens any archive, useful file conversion feature, good encryption. Cons: Never had a problem in over 1 year Other Thoughts: NoneWas this review helpful?   49 out of 78 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2011-09-04 |
| | |
"Hijacked my browsers"
by: greagan
PeaZip 3.9.1
Cons: all 3 of my browsers were hijacked and redirected to isearch.avg.com. Took me a very long time to remove the hijack script installer_cfg.ini Other Thoughts: unacceptableWas this review helpful? 18 out of 74 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2011-09-02 |
| | |
"Excellent"
by: Dravida
PeaZip 3.4
Pros: Very fast extraction using shortcuts to extract to bookmars, desktop, and documents. Cons: No major showstopper I can think of Other Thoughts: 3.4 is far more extraction-driven than previous version, the new extraction menu in the toolsar is amazing!Was this review helpful? 86 out of 150 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-10-25 |
| | |
"Old version better"
by: Davo
PeaZip 3.4
Pros: Seems the best apart from below Cons: Getting complicated for us amateurs! Other Thoughts: Tried version 3.3,but it had lost the usefulness of version 3.1
ie right click- extract in a new folder
Please realise most of use haven't got the ability to mess around with settings
Hope they restore it.Was this review helpful? 73 out of 149 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-10-25 |
| | |
"Cool unzip utility"
by: Theo
PeaZip 3.3
Pros: Extracts any format I've tried (mostry RAR, ZIP, 7Z, TAR), it's fast, it's easy and it is free. Cons: In some months of use I did not saw any major con. Other Thoughts: Pretty cool also for having features like strong encryption, and secure deletion.Was this review helpful? 87 out of 164 users found this review helpful.
| | 2010-10-01 |
| | |
"Very good. Only one thing..."
by: Geiler Ficker
Other Thoughts: Only one thing I'd like to see improved: Implement an option to change file associations. File associations can only be made on installation, but are nowhere to find in options. Also, the context menu it shows when righ-clicking an archive, is ugly.Was this review helpful? 72 out of 194 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2010-01-20 |
| | |
"A must have"
by: Giambo
Other Thoughts: Excellent, compresses fast and a lot.Was this review helpful? 82 out of 160 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-11-10 |
| | |
"Very nice utility"
by: Tori
Other Thoughts: The best compressor/extractor, useful also for secure deletion and encryption.Was this review helpful? 79 out of 148 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-09-19 |
| | |
"still complicated"
by: Dave
Other Thoughts: Still very complicated in usage. Totally overloaded with settings and a confusing interface.Was this review helpful? 136 out of 234 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-05-07 |
| | |
"Simple interface"
by: ralph
Other Thoughts: In this version the interface was made very simple, I criticized it in past but now it as friendly as WinRarWas this review helpful? 86 out of 176 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-05-06 |
| | |
"scrambled interface"
by: Fozzie
Other Thoughts: The user interface is totally scrambled and flooded with settings. Very hard to use. Only for Geeks and Nerds.Was this review helpful? 82 out of 163 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-05-05 |
| | |
"Very user friendly"
by: Gnn68
Other Thoughts: Simple and user friendly to the extreme, but also very complete.Was this review helpful? 74 out of 144 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-02-27 |
| | |
"complicated"
by: mike
Other Thoughts: it's very complicated to use. i prefer 7-zip.Was this review helpful? 73 out of 158 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-01-30 |
| | |
"peazip"
by: cyp
Other Thoughts: best for extracting rar files, you will definately love this program, 5 starWas this review helpful? 106 out of 187 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-12-23 |
| | |
"Good"
by: astral_cyborg
Other Thoughts: Lite interface, good support for the various compression formats. It works fine. Good choice for me, too!Was this review helpful? 80 out of 158 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-11-29 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
