| | | |
|
|
 | | |
"orion"
by: orionlam
Other Thoughts: the best site its yourWas this review helpful?   57 out of 114 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-03-23 |
| | |
"asaaa"
by: Aliass11
Other Thoughts: thanks for opper.Was this review helpful? 61 out of 124 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-03-03 |
| | |
by: seth
Other Thoughts: Stay with google earth.Was this review helpful? 60 out of 117 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-02-27 |
| | |
"Wow!!!"
by: fabio
Other Thoughts: With the new "sun shadow" feature, World Wind has achieved such an astonishing rendering quality. Yes, World Wind does not have all the detailed maps that Google Earth has but when available, the rendering quality of the first is so much better.Was this review helpful? 67 out of 133 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-01-27 |
| | |
"Very nice"
by: alpha1
Other Thoughts: Very nice program. Google Earth has more cities with details, but you always have to be connected to the internet. With WorldWind you can download the blue marble data and much larger files to use it offline. A pity it is developed in the bulky .net framework.Was this review helpful? 60 out of 117 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-01-15 |
| | |
"hajime saito"
by: pointless
Other Thoughts: downloaded just plain worthless unless u like blurry spots, i have a high end system and have way beyond all sytem requirements. that is why its is pointless for me...Was this review helpful? 62 out of 120 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2007-01-09 |
| | |
"not good"
by: joeres
Other Thoughts: is not working properelyWas this review helpful? 57 out of 128 users found this review helpful.
| | 2007-01-08 |
| | |
"Resolution"
by: Rick
Other Thoughts: Google Earth has good resolution only for some areas. With WorldWind I can see my house; with Google Earth I can barely find my street.Was this review helpful? 65 out of 136 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2006-04-18 |
| | |
"Looks ok but why .net...."
by: John-Beem
Other Thoughts: I'm not going to slow down my system be installing .net again.
would be nice if people could just stick with plain Windows applications.Was this review helpful? 53 out of 129 users found this review helpful.
| | 2006-04-11 |
| | |
"Awesome!"
by: Fabio
Other Thoughts: Google Earth might have more detailed maps--They can use all the data from KeyHole--but WWind rocks when in perspective mode!Was this review helpful? 56 out of 124 users found this review helpful.
| | 2006-04-10 |
| | |
"So... Google Earth Pretty Much Owns On This."
by: dancrew32
Other Thoughts: Yeah.. Google earth is free. and better. so get that. instead of this.Was this review helpful? 60 out of 131 users found this review helpful.
| | 2005-10-25 |
| | |
by:
Other Thoughts: u can do that with Google Earth, its got mapping tools, and setelite imagery or w/e its called so yeah... oh and some citys are in 3DWas this review helpful? 68 out of 137 users found this review helpful.
| | 2005-08-15 |
| | |
"Too bad"
by: Spaceman
Other Thoughts: I spent 1 hour downloading. At the end of it all, I couldn't see any rivers. Make sure you have the correct OS and drivers before wasting your time. Check with the website.Was this review helpful? 54 out of 113 users found this review helpful.
| | 2005-04-18 |
| | |
"Ladis, the download link worked for me!"
by: MarkM
Other Thoughts: I don't understand what happened with you Ladis, but the download link works perfectly. Why not give it another try if you haven't already!Was this review helpful? 46 out of 107 users found this review helpful.
| | 2005-04-17 |
| | |
"Why"
by: Ladis
Other Thoughts: Download does not start!!! Why???Was this review helpful? 55 out of 118 users found this review helpful.
| | 2005-04-16 |
| | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
