 |  |  |  | | | | | |
|  | | | "alot of hype for not much"
by: Gorlash
Other Thoughts: Geeezzz... five different windows and sub-windows, two different speedometer displays, and tons of other superfluous stuff (including a huge popup ad at the end), to display a simple number that countless other programs present, more quickly and easily. I *swear* I heard this poor program gasping for breath before it was done! Someone is a little too full of themself...Was this review helpful?   27 out of 52 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-07-22 | | | | "I Hate Pop Ups"
by: PCAdvisor
Other Thoughts: I really hate pop-ups and adware. This is supposed to be freeware, not adware. Uninstalled it and it left traces of the program on my computer.Was this review helpful? 21 out of 41 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2009-07-21 | | | | "Decent"
by: Don
Other Thoughts: CPU-Z seems better.
This is very flashy looking but checking the results on their top processor speeds seems to give some very wrong results.
How can you have a processor that is rated at 4GZ running at an "actual" speed of 8mhz?
Something just don't seem right with that!Was this review helpful? 23 out of 40 users found this review helpful.
| | 2009-02-13 | | | | by: Robin
Other Thoughts: Doesn't seem to take speed-step technology into account on my Dell laptop. Over-flashy GUI. Uninstall leaves the directory in Program Files and the Start Programs entry. Overall very poor!Was this review helpful? 26 out of 51 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-08-04 | | | | "v- 3.0.2.2"
by: mweizor
Other Thoughts: For me, it was accurate.
It did correctly reflect my slight overclock.
But its CPU Info section , for Memory, just said "Description: 'memory' = 'memory'" (?)... granted , this is an older CPU, but I didn't find the Info feature deeply informative.
What I found interesting, on its comparison page, was how many speeds fell short of published speeds.Was this review helpful? 22 out of 49 users found this review helpful.
|  | 2008-08-02 | | | | "Could be Better.."
by: Joe
Other Thoughts: Could be Better.. CPU-Z is far better.. It gives alot more info about your CPU..Was this review helpful? 24 out of 41 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-08-01 | | | | "great!"
by: aku46
Other Thoughts: it say that my Pentium M 1.73GHz run at 1706 Mhz.Was this review helpful? 30 out of 52 users found this review helpful.
| | 2008-05-24 | | | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
