|
|
 | Review | Rating | Date |
|
| "small but heavy" i agree this s/w use small amount of hdisk but it took a lot of ram memory. try open big pdf file using sumatra & foxit. u can see the difference. the rendering is so dissappointing
by: aku46
| 2 | 2008-08-12 |
|
|
| "Good enough" Foxit take 1.89 MB in my HD space. But this s/w only need 1.06 MB!
Well...goodbye Foxit....
by: Sumatra-Indonesia
| 4 | 2008-06-11 |
|
|
| "Fair" Well, nearly no features (is enough for some people) and I find the rendering quite slow. PDF XChange Viewer of Foxit are miles ahead.
by: MAD
| 2 | 2008-05-28 |
|
|
| "I love it!" I just love this application. When I discovered it, I threw away Acrobat. Slim, fast and portable.
by: Jeus
| 5 | 2008-05-28 |
|
|
| "SumatraPDF 0.7" Crap GUI design, doesn't always work, don't bother with this.
Stick with older version of Adobe (5.0 is stable and works very well) or Foxit, although I'm not a big fan of Foxit any longer. It too has weird issues.
by: etalmar
| 1 | 2007-07-29 |
|
|
| "" Nothing fancy but it seems to do the job and it's portable, but not as good as Foxit reader.
by: me
| 3 | 2007-03-05 |
|
|
| "Won't Work on Win 98SE" The writeup claims it will work under 'Windows ALL.' Don't belive it. It seems to install OK on Win 98, but it won't open a PDF file. Save your time and get Adobe.
by: GBJ
| 1 | 2007-03-03 |
|
|
